QR Code API Comparison 2026: Finding the Right Fit
Choosing a QR code API shouldn't be complicated. You need to generate codes, maybe track scans, and not get surprised by your bill at the end of the month.
In this post, we compare the major QR code APIs available in 2026, with an honest look at pricing, features, and developer experience.
The Quick Summary
| Provider | Pricing Model | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| QRStar | Pay-per-use ($0.001-$0.01) | Variable volume, cost-conscious |
| Beaconstac/Uniqode | Subscription ($49-$349/mo) | Enterprise with steady volume |
| QR Tiger | Subscription ($7-$37/mo) | Small business, basic needs |
| Scanova | Subscription ($15-$49/mo) | Marketing teams |
Pricing Breakdown
QRStar
QRStar uses pure pay-per-use pricing with no monthly minimums:
- Static QR codes: $0.001 per code
- Dynamic QR codes: $0.01 per code
- Scan tracking: $0.0001 per scan
This means you only pay for what you use. Generate 100 static codes? That's $0.10. Generate 1,000 dynamic codes with 50,000 scans? That's $15.
Beaconstac/Uniqode
Beaconstac (now Uniqode) targets enterprise customers:
- Starter: $49/month for 2 users, basic analytics
- Pro: $99/month for 5 users, advanced analytics
- Business: $349/month for unlimited users, API access
You're paying for seats and features, not usage. Good if you have predictable needs and budget.
QR Tiger
QR Tiger offers budget-friendly subscriptions:
- Regular: $7/month for 3 dynamic QR codes
- Advanced: $16/month for 10 dynamic QR codes
- Premium: $37/month for 100 dynamic QR codes
The catch: you're limited by number of codes, not usage.
Scanova
Scanova sits in the middle:
- Lite: $15/month for 5 dynamic codes
- Basic: $25/month for 10 dynamic codes
- Normal: $49/month for 25 dynamic codes
Similar limits to QR Tiger, with a focus on design customization.
Feature Comparison
Static QR Code Generation
All providers handle basic static QR codes well. The differences are in customization:
| Feature | QRStar | Beaconstac | QR Tiger | Scanova |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Custom colors | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Logo embedding | Coming soon | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| SVG export | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Max size | 2048px | 1000px | 2000px | 1500px |
| Error correction | L/M/Q/H | M only | L/M/Q/H | M/Q/H |
Dynamic QR Codes
This is where providers differentiate:
| Feature | QRStar | Beaconstac | QR Tiger | Scanova |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editable destination | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Scan analytics | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Geographic data | Yes | Yes | Yes | Limited |
| Device detection | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| A/B testing | Coming soon | Yes | No | No |
| Expiration dates | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
API Quality
For developers, the API matters as much as features:
| Aspect | QRStar | Beaconstac | QR Tiger | Scanova |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| REST API | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Response time | Under 100ms | ~200ms | ~300ms | ~250ms |
| Rate limits | 1000/min | 100/min | 60/min | 50/min |
| SDKs | Node.js | Python, JS | PHP, Python | None |
| Docs quality | Excellent | Good | Basic | Basic |
Developer Experience
QRStar
const response = await fetch('https://api.qrstar.app/v1/generate', {
method: 'POST',
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
'X-API-Key': 'your_api_key'
},
body: JSON.stringify({
data: 'https://example.com',
size: 512
})
});
const { qr_code_url } = await response.json();
Clean, minimal API. You get a URL to the generated image.
Beaconstac
const response = await fetch('https://api.beaconstac.com/v2/qrcodes/', {
method: 'POST',
headers: {
'Authorization': 'Token your_token',
'Content-Type': 'application/json'
},
body: JSON.stringify({
name: 'My QR Code',
qr_type: 1,
location_enabled: false,
fields: { url: 'https://example.com' }
})
});
More verbose, requires more configuration upfront.
QR Tiger
const response = await fetch('https://api.qrtiger.com/api/qr/static', {
method: 'POST',
headers: {
'Authorization': 'Bearer your_token',
'Content-Type': 'application/json'
},
body: JSON.stringify({
size: 500,
colorDark: '000000',
qrData: 'https://example.com',
qrCategory: 'url'
})
});
Works, but the response format varies between endpoints.
When to Choose Each
Choose QRStar if:
- Your volume varies month to month
- You want to pay only for what you use
- You need fast API response times
- You're building developer tools or SaaS products
Choose Beaconstac if:
- You have enterprise budget and steady volume
- You need advanced features like A/B testing now
- Your team needs a visual dashboard
Choose QR Tiger if:
- You're a small business with basic needs
- You want the lowest monthly cost
- You don't need API access
Choose Scanova if:
- Design customization is your priority
- You need a marketing-focused solution
- You have a small, fixed number of codes
The Bottom Line
There's no universally "best" QR code API. It depends on your use case:
Variable volume? Pay-per-use (QRStar) saves money.
Enterprise with budget? Subscription services (Beaconstac) offer more features.
Just getting started? Try a free tier first, then scale.
The best choice is the one that matches how you actually use QR codes, not the one with the longest feature list.
Ready to try pay-per-use QR codes? Create your free QRStar account and generate your first code in seconds.